Yeh, the cavalry finally arrives, I am saved. ;-)
> it is then the linkers job to link only the object files that are needed
> (and really used in the application) to make the executable.
Yes, yes, yes and re-yes.
> I guess showing them the content of the ppas.sh file is all that they
> should need as proof.
Huh, it is already one week (7 days) that I repeat it on each answer.
> Some developers are harder to convince about potential problems or bugs.
Yes but here it is different. Did you see that they do not want that I
answer any more?
Sincerely, if it was for one of my project, I never will fight and accept to
be insulted in each of their answer, this more than a week.
But here it is about the honor of fpc who was accused to produce bad code.
> The alternative (if you know exactly what the problem is), is to modify
> the ld linker yourself and see if it then works on your system.
Yep or prove that a gcc or clang or llvm compiler that use ld +
--gc-sections produce binary not usable in multi-arch.
Thanks Graeme, I was beginning to think that I was in a nightmare without
Many thanks ;-)
View this message in context:
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
fpc-pascal maillist - firstname.lastname@example.org