Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
29. Am I correct to assume ?
ordinal-type = ordinal-type-identifier .
ordinal-type-identifier = identifier .
Yes.
That may not be correct after-all, because an <ordinal-type> e.g. indexes arrays
array-type = [ "PACKED" | "bitpacked" ] "ARRAY" [ "[" ordinal-type { "," ordinal-type } "]" ] "OF"
type .
In ISO-7185 Pascal we have
array-type = "array" "[" index-type { "," index-type } "]" "of"
component-type .
index-type = ordinal-type .
ordinal-type = new-ordinal-type | ordinal-type-identifier .
new-ordinal-type = enumerated-type | subrange-type .
enumerated-type = "(" identifier-list ")" .
subrange-type = constant ".." constant .
And in the FreePascal Language Reference <subrange-type> seems not to be
referenced by any other rule.
subrange-type = constant ".." constant .
I suggest to change <ordinal-type> to
ordinal-type = ordinal-type-identifier | subrange-type |
enumerated-type .
Regards,
Adriaan van Os
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
