Andrei Tchijov wrote:
> Sounds quite reasonable.
> 
> What about win32-libusb folks?  Are they "on-board" with this new 
> development?

Haven't heard anything from them or any other porters. I will make an 
effort to contact specific people when I feel libusb-1.0 is in a state 
where porting efforts can start (right now the design isn't quite 
settled, and there are things I can do to make it easier for porters).

Daniel

_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint

Reply via email to