On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:17 +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:34:36PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > I would urge you to use fprintd instead of libfprint directly (and you'd > > get the Python bindings for free). > > Sounds like a good idea. > > I am trying to compile 4ea1c48 and getting the following error. Do I > need a newer version of something?
Yes, newer libfprint. Cheers _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
