On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 17:59 +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:17 +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:34:36PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > I would urge you to use fprintd instead of libfprint directly (and you'd > > > > get the Python bindings for free). > > > > > > Sounds like a good idea. > > On second thought, why not use libfprint directly? > > My application's needs are modest. I need to register a bunch of > employees with a name and optional photo. There will be no corresponding > account in /etc/passwd. That's about it. > > Are there any other benefits from using fprintd that I ought to be aware > of?
Pluggable storage backends, work-arounds for a number of libfprint bugs, usable from Python and other languages without the need for specific bindings. And it's nicely documented :) _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
