|
Doea
anyone know whether Framingham has a standard policy in place for "linkage fees"
such as Boston has? Or whether they have been considered? This might be a way to
begin to generate revenue for the same purposes as the CPA -
land acquisition, historic preservation and affordable housing - without
the onerous burden on current property owners. It also might have the great
advantage of being far less divisive for Town residents, who seem to polarize on
so many issues about money.
I
believe that Boston charges a 5 percent fee to developers; they know about it in
advance and plan on it as part of the cost of their development. There was a
fuss a few years ago when the City contemplated raising it to 7 percent I think,
and that was considered too high and would have stifled growth. This is
different than a "tax" on the sale of property and, I think, it is based on the
construction costs, but someone would have to check this out. It would be very
interesting to know what the gross amount of revenue generated by such a fee
would be.
In any
case, the moneys thus generated could be used to fund the purchase of open
space, some of the small parcels left that might make good neighborhood
playgrounds for kids or be sufficient, perhaps, for monthly payments on long
term purchase agreements for larger parcels. Perhaps we might designate our own
percentage split in advance, so developers and Town Officials would have
knowledge of how the money would be directed? Reflecting my own impressions
maybe 60% land, 20% historic and 20% affordable housing could be successful in
Framingham.
Hoping
everyone is enjoying the spectacular weather!
Joel A. Feingold
|
- Last Night re. Arthur St parcel NICOLA CATALDO
- another thought--Re: Last Night re. Arthur St parcel Kathy Vassar
- Re: Last Night re. Arthur St parcel Joel A Feingold
- Re: Last Night re. Arthur St parcel TFLAROSE
- Re: Last Night re. Arthur St parcel WELLFLT
