One last comment: CK should be providing a detail of the wall construction. This should include the footings appropriate for a wall of its particular height. The building department can see if the wall is conforming to best construction practices when the excess wall is removed leaving a inside view of how the wall was constructed. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kathy Vassar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "George P. King, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "framingham neighbors" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "town meeting members" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "p1tmm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "betsy swartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 2:16 PM Subject: Re: [tmm] The Wall
> In short - we have what was suppose to have been a 5 ft. wall and instead > turned into one 3 or 4 or maybe even 5 times that height, as well as being > improperly constructed. the wall was ordered removed after plans for doing > so were provided and approved. > > CK does not do that. Instead he submits a site plan (it's in the building > dept) to leave the wall making some modifications to the length but not the > height. We have not enforced our town's bylaws, rules or regulations once > again. And we wonder why neighbors are frustrated and angry with process in > this town? > > CK has said repeatedly that he can do what he wants. Once more he seems to > have proven his point. The Planning Board needs to have opinions from the > town depts to back up their rulings. once again all the neighbors will have > to go back to a whole new series of meetings where CK openly skoffs at the > planning process. > > kathy vassar > tmm p1
