Yes, I recall that there was difficulty over the sewer and water lines.
And I recall that there was a $400,000 number - and that astute
negotiation by Chris Petrini managed to get the amount the town paid
reduced by several hundred thousands. Wonder what would have happened had
he been in charge of the whole shebang to begin with? As he is now, as
town counsel in the Danforth Farms negotiation.

Speaking of the 9/90 development with the tight pipes. That was the one
that was the refuse dump that required capping at a cost no one could
estimate, wasn't it? The one that, as part of the deal, National
Development undertook to cap it at an expected cost of $300,000, but
knowing it could cost twice as much or more? Which, with the DEP on our
tails about capping it, was the reason the town really _needed_ to get rid
of it to begin with?

9/90? Ah, yes, the empty lot bringing in virtually no revenue whatsoever
that now has a number of major office buildings on it, all sending in
their taxes each year? I could whine about the TIF, I suppose - except,
even so, it's still a good deal. And I remember how attractive it was when
I first saw it - a weed-choked field with an old building on it that was
being pillaged by vandals. Almost as attractive as the NESG site.

Yes, development at NESG will bring more traffic to OCP, whether it is as
a PUD or an office complex. No, it will not go away, and if you really
want to see a lawsuit, just try refusing the owner and developer access to
Riverpath without an airtight legal case. Somehow I find the notion of
spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in town money on a case we will
almost certainly lose less attractive than accepting $2 million for
Riverpath access to the PUD and $3 million more in traffic mitigation. And
I live on the east side of OCP.

I am so sick of people in this town chopping at each other and chopping at
everything. And I really do not appreciate this campaign attack on the
current Board of Selectmen, town counsel, and Planning Board.

The question is, do we really want to maintain a played-out gravel pit as
the centerpiece of Saxonville? We're not likely to get it, even if we do.
Something big is going in, and the two questions for Framingham to ask
are, would we rather have offices or neighbors? And, if the former, is
there something to be gained by allowing the permitting process now rather
than not?

Rene Mandel
Pct. 3

Reply via email to