Word has its place, but if you want to have a structured/disciplined
approach to document creation, Frame wins hands down. There really is no
comparison. I tried using WWP for Word, but I was so frustrated trying
to set up the Word document for WWP that I gave up and went back to
Frame. And I might add, I've been doing this for 18 years, and have been
using Word since version 2.0, and there are still so many things I just
don't get about it.
Ron
Steve Rickaby wrote:
At 16:15 -0400 17/5/06, Ron Miller wrote:
If I experiment with style changes, Word creates a new style like Body + blue
font + 6 pt line spacing. It handles numbered lists very poorly and it is
quirky and seems to lack any coherent use model. Frame on the other, while not
perfect (what software is) and certainly less intuitive at least does what you
want it to do and doesn't try to do so many things you wish it wouldn't.
I think the key difference can be summed up by saying that Word takes a
lifetime to master to the degree at which it can be used to produce results
comparable to those that can be produced quite easily with Frame. It can be
done, but is it worth it?
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com
Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
