At 20:17 -0400 25/4/07, Diane Gaskill wrote: >Hello Frameratti,
I like that... but shouldn't it be 'Framerati'? You might be thinking of 'Frameretti', i.e. little Framers ;-) >Remember the old days when we had debates and comparisons between the dreaded >Word and Frame? Well, now it seems that the new competitor is Arbortext. I >had my manager convinced to switch from Word to FM, even got the ok to build >the templates (done), when along comes a VP in one of our offshore offices who >thinks using Arbortext is better and convinces my manager to have us look at >it too. I know only what I have read on this list, although it's a subject I keep an eye on. My suggestion would be to carefully calculate total cost of ownership of both options. From what I've heard, almost everything is a mega-cost-plus option in Arbortext. Someone who'd set up their own system at their own expenses a couple of years ago was posting here, and I got the impression that although you can get up and running with Epic at around the same cost as FrameMaker, just to *print* anything, for example, was a few thousand dollars more. These tools seem to be priced for major corporates, not for single writers or small authoring teams. -- Steve _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
