> I have gone with "1(a)...(c)" for now, but you are right, "1(a) to 1(c)" is more correct.
> I do like that idea though Stuart, how about 1(a...c)? > Cheers > Alan Ummm ... I think the "1(a) to 1(c)" is best. The "1(a...c)" is a bit too unusual looking and *could* lead to confusion. The "1(a)...(c)" is not bad, but the missing '1' before the 'c' makes it a *bit* less appealing. BTW, *sometimes*, I have gotten carried away and used, in similar situations, constructs like "1(a) through 1(c)" or even "1(a) through to 1(c)", but these are both overkill ... particularly when the 'c' is not too "far away" from 'a', if you know what I mean! :) Z _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as [email protected]. Send list messages to [email protected]. To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email protected] or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to [email protected]. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
