No problem, Peter. Thanks for thinking it over :) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Gold Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:33 PM To: Pinkham, Jim Cc: Art Campbell; [email protected] Subject: Re: Footnote Out of Sequence
Hi, Jim: On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Pinkham, Jim <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Peter -- > > Thanks for taking this on. The sequence is 1,2,2,1. The first three > are fine. The second 2 is indeed accomplished by the cross-reference > technique. The only thing I had expected, based on the marked-up > manual I'm revising, was that the final footnote would be a 3, not a > 1. Based on Art's comment, the 1 is apparently what should be expected > because it is a new table. If there's another way to get to 3 for the > final note, in addition to the approach Art suggested, I'd be > interested to learn about it and consider going that route. Unless it's possible to fake the two tables as a single table, I'm out of ideas. Regards, Peter __________________ Peter Gold KnowHow ProServices _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as [email protected]. Send list messages to [email protected]. To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email protected] or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to [email protected]. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
