One more thing regarding this: I highly doubt that Adobe is going to do this
anyway. The next best thing would be a light-weight, inexpensive editor,
either in a browser or stand-alone, that would work with a schema to enforce
standards. I suppose I am thinking of an XML editor, so maybe this already
exists. Any suggestions, recommendations, or further discussion, would be
welcome. Thank you very much.

 

Rick Quatro

Carmen Publishing Inc.

585-659-8267

[email protected]

 

*** Frame Automation blog at http://frameautomation.com

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anthony Davey
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Frame Light, what's the potential market?

 

Cross posted to dita-frameusers, so ignore as needed ...

 

I had an interesting discussion with the Frame Product Manager a few days
ago at
the London launch event for TCS3.  It seems there is the motivation to
develop a
business case for 'Frame Light' which could be used by SMEs to create and
review
content, but little else.
 
I work in an environment where I am the only Frame user (experimenting with
10
at the moment) in an organisation with over 100 SMEs producing content in
Word.
Most do their own thing, or come to me to 'fix' or standardise stuff once it
is
collected together.
 
So, I would want 'Frame Light' to allow content creation in structured or
unstructured format (including DITA one day), but that requires the content
provider to use only the pre-determined paragraph formats and a few text
styles
(emphasis, bold, sub- and superscript); and insert images by reference.  I
can
get around a need to define conditional text by using different paragraph
format
names.  All this in templates that can only be developed or altered by full
license holders.
 
To support the development of a business case can you post what (other)
functionality you would want Frame Light to have, how many licenses you
would
(ideally) want in your organisation, how many full Frame licenses you
currently
have (for comparison purposes), how you would want FL delivered (local
install,
web-based, floating licenses), and what you would want/need to pay for it to
get
it accepted as an alternative to Whatever word processing your SMEs
currently
use?
 
Creating more disciplined (structured), reusable, content which can be
output
with a similar look and feel, and doesn't reinvent a wheel each time an SME
puts
fingers to keyboard, is a concept which has almost reached its time in my
organisation. Others may be close, or even ahead, so there must be demand
for
this.  Please let me know.
 
Best regards,
Ant 


_____________________________________________________________________
The content of this email (and any attachment) is confidential. It may also
be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.

This email should not be used by anyone who is not an original intended
recipient, nor may it be copied or disclosed to anyone who is not an
original intended recipient. If you have received this email by mistake
please notify us by emailing the sender, and then delete the email and any
copies from your system.

Liability cannot be accepted for statements made which are clearly the
senders own and not made on behalf of the Rail Safety and Standards Board
(RSSB).

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________


You are currently subscribed to framers as [email protected].

Send list messages to [email protected].

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[email protected]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [email protected]. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.

Reply via email to