Good Day Art and Natalie,
If you are looking at only spelling and grammar, perhaps. However, the problems
encountered at our site deal more with content (complete procedures, no link
from the help file to an application's Help buttons, lack of option and data
column descriptions, and more) and the structure of documents.
A couple of years ago our expert (of spelling and grammer) reviewed a
contractor's publication and offered a couple of comments. What the expert had
missed was the description of the software application was backwards of the
application's actual purpose and operation.
Afraid I must say that proofing a document depends upon the purpose of that
proofing.
Best,
Denise L. Moss-Fritch
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Art Campbell" <[email protected]>
> In practical terms, it should be the person who gets zinged if there's
> a mistake and/or the person in the organization with the best spelling
> and grammar skills.
>
> If you're asking a process question, I'd say no, it should never be
> the writer because he/she has looked at the copy too much to look at
> it with fresh eyes.
>
> But back in practical terms, if the writer is the best speller /
> grammarian, he/she is likely to get stuck with the job.
>
> Art
>
>
>
> On 12/15/06, Natalie Bircher wrote:
> > This is off topic, but something that we all must come across as
> > writers. Who should be responsible for the final proofing of the
> > documents you write? Should it ever be the writer?
