Sorry, I was thinking frame to html help, where frame's toc is ignored.

Now I have it right, and fixing frame's toc fixes the toc in the pdf.  

It's been a long week...

Paul


 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Ridder, Fred" <fred.rid...@intel.com>
> The list of paragraph tags to include as PDF bookmarks is stored
> both in the book and in each individual file. Specifying additional
> tags from the book file's PDF Setup dialog saves the additions 
> in each component file as well as in the book file (that's why that
> operation is so slow sometimes). But removing tags from the 
> list in the book file doesn't always remove the tags in the lists
> stored in the individual files. And it is a feature of FrameMaker
> that any tags specified in individual files will get picked up in
> the bookmarks in addition to the globally selected list.
> 
> The bottom line is that you probably need to go into the PDF 
> Setup dialog of each individual file to de-select the tags you 
> no longer want picked up as bookmarks. 
> 
> My opinions only; I don't speak for Intel.
> Fred Ridder (fred dot ridder at intel dot com)
> Intel
> Parsippany, NJ
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: framers-bounces+fred.ridder=intel.com at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces+fred.ridder=intel.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
> Behalf Of obair81 at comcast.net
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:30 PM
> To: framers
> Subject: frame to pdf question
> 
> In the Frame Print Book dialog, I wanted to set things so one less
> paragraph tag to get included in the PDF TOC.  In the PDF Setup for
> selected files dialog, Bookmarks tab, I changed the list of tags in the
> Include Paragraphs box, thinking that would do it, as per usual.
> 
> I noticed that acrobat ignored my change.  The PDF TOC was unchanged.  
> 
> So I took out all but one tag, and the PDF TOC upon regeneration was
> unchanged.
> 
> I have Generate PDF bookmarks checked, as always.
> 
> I have never seen this before.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> best,
> Paul
> _______________________________________________



Reply via email to