At 10:34 -0500 31/1/07, Kenneth C. Benson wrote > > I agree totally with Steve: ID2.0 was very primitive > >Then you agree with Ken, not Steve. Although Steve may also hold those >sentiments, he didn't say anything about ID2.
Yeah, I was wondering about this, especially as I'm still on InD 2.0 ;-) Still, useful to know about the better features of CS2: I'll upgrade just as soon as another InD project comes in. -- Steve
