I can't see how quality can possibly be subjective if there's an
entire occupation devoted to assuring it. Perhaps TW has only worked
in environments where "quality" is merely a buzzword.

On 10/19/07, Flato, Gillian <gflato at nanometrics.com> wrote:
> I have seen enough bug reports in my time to know that quality is not
> subjective. If the software generates a mile-long list of bugs reported
> by customers and QA people, the software application is crap.

Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter
STC Single-Sourcing SIG Manager

Reply via email to