Lin Surasky wrote:
> You're right. It's not touching, but it's close. Even if it's 4 pt from
> the border, it's still not centered. And I did double-check the table
> definition, and no negative numbers are used. The mis-alignment lessens
> as the rows get taller; the worst offender is with the row that's a
> single line tall. 
> (Thanks for keeping me honest...)

Hi Lin,

Just to ensure absolute clarity:  Richard said to double-check the Table 
Cell tab of the *Paragraph* designer; you say you checked the "table 
definition," which implies the Table designer.  You have checked both 
places, right?

(If you're still stuck and want to send me the table off-list, I'll see 
if I can spot anything...)

Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, Canada
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325

srogers phoenix-geophysics com

"It is not enough that I succeed.
  Others must fail."

-- Oscar Wilde

Reply via email to