Lin Surasky wrote: > You're right. It's not touching, but it's close. Even if it's 4 pt from > the border, it's still not centered. And I did double-check the table > definition, and no negative numbers are used. The mis-alignment lessens > as the rows get taller; the worst offender is with the row that's a > single line tall. > > (Thanks for keeping me honest...) >
Hi Lin, Just to ensure absolute clarity: Richard said to double-check the Table Cell tab of the *Paragraph* designer; you say you checked the "table definition," which implies the Table designer. You have checked both places, right? (If you're still stuck and want to send me the table off-list, I'll see if I can spot anything...) -- Stuart Rogers Technical Communicator Phoenix Geophysics Limited Toronto, ON, Canada +1 (416) 491-7340 x 325 srogers phoenix-geophysics com "It is not enough that I succeed. Others must fail." -- Oscar Wilde