Thanks for the suggestion, Ann. We thought of this too. Because of the complexity of the information and the number of columns in the first table (as many as 33), I couldn't make this method work either.
Theresa -----Original Message----- From: Ann Balaban [mailto:abala...@tsystem.com] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 8:21 AM To: Theresa Zamborsky Subject: FW: Framers Digest, Vol 27, Issue 3 I would probably end up making one table and just formatting the sections differently using straddles and splits. I'll be interested in seeing what kind of response you get. Regards, annb --- The T System 469-791-2454 -----Original Message----- Message: 7 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:49:15 -0800 From: "Theresa Zamborsky" <ther...@marvell.com> Subject: Keeping Two Tables Together in Frame 6.0 To: <framers at lists.frameusers.com> Message-ID: <5617383E5665B048B109AB2C9294AE090106063D at sc-exch03.marvell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, Does anyone have suggestions of how to keep two tables (that use different table formats) together in Frame 6.0? These two tables are both anchored on the same blank para. line, but sometimes the second table paginates to the next page. Because of Frame scripts that we use, the two tables need to remain anchored on the same para. line for the time being. I already tried having the tables anchored to two separate para. lines and keeping those two para. lines together, but that breaks our Frame script. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks, Theresa
