Hmmm... Do I sense a touch of sarcasm? In no less sarcaustic a vein, I would counter with this...
Technical writers using desktop software are like trilobites, fairly numerous denizens of a vast and murky sea that is about to undergo a major geologic event. Scuttering about at the bottom of the sea, they glean whatever nutrients they can from the scum that larger and more powerful life forms trail behind them (sorry... Wall Street has got me down). They cannot see that the next massive earth quake will bury a significant percent of their number, to vanish for eons until their fossil remains are unearthed by curious life forms hence. I suggest scuttering away from that overhang that's shading you and out into more open waters, even if there's less scum out there to gnosh on at present. But I do like your representation of big business in general. Did you watch Food Inc the other day? Talk about dinosaurs! cud ________________________________ From: Alan T Litchfield <[email protected]> To: Chris Despopoulos <despopoulos_chriss at yahoo.com> Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com Sent: Mon, April 26, 2010 5:19:14 PM Subject: Re: Adobe's New Corporate Strategies So Chris, If we extend your prehistoric analogy, Adobe has become like the semi-stationary sauropod who's legs are so vast that it must stand in one place and swings its great neck to reach the greenest morsels. The reach of its head and mouth are limited to the extent and range of motion afforded by that great appendage we call the corporate marketing department. Any future it has is relative to how fast it can move to get at shrubbery further along its path whereas long ago it used to search out and hunt down niches of greenness, when it was smaller and lithe. Now it is a huge behemoth, waiting for the inevitability of destruction as hungry carnivores range about its feet and soar above its head. And as with any large bodied and small brained creature, the Adobesaurus takes an apparent random path in search of new fodder, settling when a new and desirable shrub is found but without displaying intelligent logic when passing up other shrubs along the way. Of course the issue for us not that the Adobesaurus has ceased to be innovative, but rather that it has passed up on succulent morsels of energy giving technologies in the mobile space, amongst others. That and, as with the monstrous sauropod, it is increasingly unaware of its surroundings, relying on its bulk to carry its momentum forward, its ability to shed annoying and parasitic customer complaints through slick external processes, and its armour plating of lawyers to ward of threats, that is until some great cataclysm destroys the environment that made its growth rate possible in the first place. Alan On 27/04/2010, at 12:07 AM, Chris Despopoulos wrote: > RE the good ole days when men were men and software was innovative. > > What we're witnessing is a natural part of any innovative curve. Back when > FrameMaker first made waves, you could subscribe to three different magazines > that printed monthly articles about new and interesting software. When's the > last time you heard of new and innovative software? I guess it was about 10 > years ago when you could subscribe to magazines just to read about new and > innovative cell phones (as a replacement to software zines). Even that has > dwindled to nearly nothing. > > Read up on your biology -- Try Stephen J. Gould's writing on the Cambrian > explosion. The idea is that we make steps along a meandering path of > punctuated equilibrium. Some cataclysm radically alters the environment. An > explosion of innovative life forms answers the new context. This is winnowed > down through time by the success of the best designs. Lather, rinse, and > repeat. Lest you raise alarms about "best", the success of Microsoft, or the > word "design", don't. You can only talk of design in this context in > retrospect, as a human construct overlaid on an inherently arbitrary and > chaotic (or at least hopelessly complex) process. > > So it is with technology. The bicycle is an excellent example. It began > with an explosion of different designs, and finally settled on the one we > know and trust. There are occasional incremental improvements, but nothing > truly innovative. The bicycle has become a commodity, where you can buy a > 30-speed mountain bike for $95.00 at your local Wallmart. But try buying a > 1-speed kid's bike these days... It can't be done. Sure, there's the cachet > market for hand-made bikes and so on. But on a global scale, the technology > has stabilized into a commodity market. > > So it is with computers. I just went through the exercise of trying to get a > laptop with portrait orientation. After all, I'm a tech writer -- I use > portrait pages. My old Inspiron 5150 has more than 1200 vertical resolution, > and I can see a whole page on it. It turns out that I have to get a full HD > screen just to get close. More machine than I need, and a significant > increase in cost. And if it wasn't for BlueRay and video games, such a > display would be completely unavailable -- the're all landscape wide screens > topping at 1280X800 or so. OTOH, the FIRST thing and MOST IMPORTANT thing > you see about any and every laptop configuration is the choice of colors. > But that's how it is with toasters, blenders, tooth brushes, and computers. > > And with desktop software. The next wave (you heard it here) is servers and > services. Currently, the software innovation I'm aware of is in managing > networks, whether managing an array of devices and applications, streams of > financial data, or encoding/decoding & QOS for multimedia. Even if you just > run it on a local host as various servers and/or virtual machines, your > software will soon all be services swapping information via XML an/or other > transports. FrameMaker per se has a limited shelf life in this scenario. > Instead, technical documentation will be written in pieces scatterd across > the cloudscape, and glommed into a coherent thought at the last possible > moment. The race will be to the last possible moment. Ultimately, that will > be as the reader asks about his current concern with his current (and fluid) > configuration. > > Are you surprised that companies are putting 20-year old software out to > pasture? FrameMaker still works, so go ahead and use it. But think about > this... What was the latest innovation they gave us? A new GUI. Big whoop. > Why don't they implement a WIKI-to-Book round trip application? Why doesn't > Adobe implement a document server that steps ahead of Eclipse Help, that you > can install on a local host, a LAN, a WAN, an appliance machine, or to > federate a cloud of appliance docs? I can't answer that. But that's where > this is headed. Changing FrameMaker from a 10-speed to a 13-speed doesn't > cut it. Neither does an amplified choice of colors. -- Alan T Litchfield AlphaByte PO Box 141, Auckland, 1140 New Zealand http://www.alphabyte.co.nz http://www.alphabyte.co.nz/beatrice
