Greg Albert said: > Am I missing something? I thought it was a humourous tale with no intended > insult whatsoever. Isn't the "* you" just Pete trying to correct the "thank > yo for responding" from his previous line? I thought it was just quirky > timing that led to it looking like an insult.
That is how I had originally thought of it too ... but then got confused by the ensuing different discussion here. :) Z