If I were working on the kind of project where the one-file-per-topic model seemed like a plus, I'd focus on authoring tools that support DocBook and/or DITA.
I don't think that projects so large that you need multiple writers make that model desirable. Usually individual writers own larger chunks of content. On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Keith Soltys <keith.soltys at tmx.com> wrote: > [Flare is] designed for content reuse, so sharing common content across > projects is easy. Since it's topic based, it's easy for more than one writer > to work on a project. It also has some very nice reporting and tracking > features. If I was working on a large project, with multiple writers, and > developing only for online output, I'd consider it. (I would probably be > using it now, at least for some projects, if we hadn't run into a showstopper > issue with their WebHelp format and our application server).
