<unlurk> I think the topic is of interest to a good portion of FM users, even if it's just ranting and speculation. As long as the subject lines are well indicative of content, I can delete the messages without reading them (as I have been doing once I tired of the topic myself). Really the only extra bandwidth to my time is scanning a longer list of email message subjects and deleting, but I do that anyway.
-- garyZ </unlurk> > -----Original Message----- > From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers- > bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Writer > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:15 PM > To: matt at mattrsullivan.com; Syed Zaeem Hosain (Syed.Hosain at aeris.net); > framers at lists.frameusers.com List > Subject: Re: OT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Adobe 'Creative Cloud' (again) > > And on the other side of the fence... > > I find it an interesting discussion. And I prefer to have it on this list > since I don't participate in many other lists. > > Sorry, Matt, my vote is for keep it online. > > Nadine > > > > >Bandwidth is measured also by the number of emails one can reasonably > read (and respond to) in a given length of time. > > > > > >I can't be the only person who is tired of reading about reactions to the > CS licensing model on this FrameMaker forum? > > > > > >I don't know anything about Adobe's plans. > > > > > >Everyone's time is worth (and costs) something?the time required to > participate and/or read these discussions thus have a cost, so I'm > asking... perhaps those with a keen interest in the topic could take the > discussion of it offline or to a CS-oriented list until Adobe indicates > this will affect FrameMaker? > > > > > >I'm happy to discuss this off-list, but as a courtesy, will be avoiding > this thread (even more) going forward. > > > > > >-Matt > > > > > > > >On Jul 17, 2013, at 11:49 PM, "Syed Zaeem Hosain (Syed.Hosain at > >aeris.net<mailto:Syed.Hosain at aeris.net>)" > <Syed.Hosain at aeris.net<mailto:Syed.Hosain at aeris.net>> wrote: > > > >In this day and age, is Internet ?bandwidth? use for text e-mails really > an issue? J > >> > >>Plus, are you saying that you know/believe that FrameMaker is not going > to be released as a cloud-based license model soon? Love to hear the news. > >> > >>And, in my opinion, btw, my discussion (feel free to call it whining > perhaps? :)) on license cost/models of FrameMaker is fair game for this > mailing list ? > >> > >>Z > _______________________________________________ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130718/808420e9/attachment.html>
