Fine, you all can have the last word. I know better than to continue this debate. I should have known better than to even start it.
Russ ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:58:29 -0700 From: Robert Lauriston <rob...@lauriston.com> To: "framers@lists.frameusers.com" Subject: Re: [Framers] I'm pretty sure the answer is structured content Message-ID: <can3yy4a5zr2tzurjgsnbhouxzt6ytpfovsuek3au-cr1a8y...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Structured markup has been around longer than the web, PDFs, online help, or personal computers. Since you make your living from structured content, I'm not going to waste time explaining why it's not the best choice for every set of requirements, and why people are still creating interesting and useful unstructured tools. On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:01 PM, <r...@weststreetconsulting.com> wrote: > Pat, I'd like to assert that structured content is generally THE answer, > period. Nothing interesting happens with unstructured content anymore, > because the technology is decades old. Any technical writer in a > high-demand environment should be using structured content. If you are > not, you are now closer to the typewriter than you are to modern > practices. ... ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ This message is from the Framers mailing list Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ Subscribe and unsubscribe at http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com
