I agree with Alan on all counts. I much prefer Reply-to-sender, for the
reasons he gives, but I can live with whatever you decide.
Best,
Johan
On 2017-01-26 20:23, Alan Houser wrote:
I _much_ prefer a default "Reply-To-Sender". Reasons:
- A default Reply-To-All is noisy. (I'll note that Carol suggested that
we reply privately to her. Why is this thread special? :-> ).
- A default Reply-To-All _will_ cause private or embarrassing messages
to go to the list, from senders who use it accidentally.
- If one accidentally replies only to the sender, that's easy to fix.
Just send the message again to the list. But it's impossible to retract
a private or embarrassing response sent to the list. There's no "undo"
for an unintentional "Reply-To-List".
Having said that, I'm grateful that this list continues (thanks,
Carol!), regardless of admin settings or ground rules.
-Alan
--
Johan Anglemark, Technical Communicator & Localization Manager.
IAR Systems AB
Box 23051, Strandbodgatan 1
SE-750 23 Uppsala, SWEDEN
Mobile: +46 708 651088, Phone: +46 18 167894, Fax: +46 18 167838
E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.iar.com
Twitter: www.twitter.com/iarsystems
_______________________________________________
This message is from the Framers mailing list
Send messages to [email protected]
Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com
Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/
Subscribe and unsubscribe at
http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com
Send administrative questions to [email protected]
