Thanks for the advice on using File > Publish, the Responsive HTML5 results are much better than the alternative I was using. However, I noticed that some fonts we use end up getting substituted, so the web version looks visibly different from the PDF. I've been making changes on the Style Mapping tab, but there's no way to add new fonts. We use the family of Univers Next Pro.
Ideas? On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:35 PM Robert Lauriston <[email protected]> wrote: > Save as HTML was never good for much. With FrameMaker 6 through 11, if > you wanted professional-looking HTML output, you used WebWorks, > RoboHelp, or MIF2Go. > > From FrameMaker 12 on, you can use the built-in subset of RoboHelp > features ("multichannel publishing"), though WebWorks ePublisher has > some advantages. > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 8:55 AM H Santoro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Let me see if I'm doing this right! > > > > The 'Save As HTML' is somewhat deprecated and clunky. It has some uses, > > but it is not able to produce a slick output. Trying the options in the > > Publish pod is a better bet.ive questions to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > > This message is from the Framers mailing list > > Send messages to [email protected] > Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com > Archives located at > http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ > Subscribe and unsubscribe at > http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com > Send administrative questions to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ This message is from the Framers mailing list Send messages to [email protected] Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ Subscribe and unsubscribe at http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com Send administrative questions to [email protected]
