On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
sounds great to me, esp after having to manually install eight or
so packages for every new test site in the correct order for far
too long... :) so, i'm +1 for accepting the PLIP.
Great! Perhaps it would be practical to select a spokesperson/
coordinator for the framework team who will deliver the final
verdict?
yes, it sure would. i've already picked up that suggestion (by
martin) and sent a mail to the team members asking, but haven't got
any responses yet... :)
/me cheers for andi as spokesperson ;)
regarding #195 i'm also +1. what i like about it, is that the actual
'heavy lifting' is done in the new versions of GS and
CMFQuickInstaller and the plip 'only' addresses their integration.
also, feature-wise it's a perfect candidate for 3.1 imho as it adds a
much requested feature w/o breaking anything. rock on.
my $0.02,
tom
andi
--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.0.3 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
