Raphael Ritz wrote:
Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far as I know I'm still release manager for 3.x. I've been waiting
for the foundation board (in the person of that same limi) to answer
some questions I asked about the release manager stipend. Once those
have been answered I'll start planning a 3.2 release.
The only reason I said anything was due to this sentence:
"We need to agree on actually doing that release and find a release
manager for it."
@Wichert So, no mal-intent :) And I agree that you've done a great job.
I'm really glad Spanky's showing so much enthusiasm and willingness
to do an
important job. That said, I think there is a lot to be said for
having the
same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and
stability perspective.
I must say that I agree with that sentiment, especially in light of
what a great job Wichert has done so far. I'm in favour of not
changing a winning formula. ;-)
I'm probably missing something but I was quite surprised
by this discussion coming up now. I would also very much
prefer Wichert to continue for the Plone 3.x line if at all
possible.
Maybe there is a way for Spanky to get "on board" for
Plone 4 by helping Wichert and thereby being trained
on the job?
I would love to shadow Wichert and help him with anything along the way.
What I *dont'* want is to slow anybody down.
@Spanky: please don't get this wrong. I very much
appreciate your willingness to take on such an important
task.
None taken, I agree with everyone :)
Raphael
~Spanky standing by...
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
