On 14.08.2008, at 13:52, Malthe Borch wrote:
Plone should probably only name the resources that the browser needs
to render the HTML document and leave it to WSGI middleware to
optimize that, e.g.
* Rebase to other hostnames
* Concatenate
* File-size reduction
that sounds really good to me.
i take it, though, that it's understood that this doesn't affect the
acceptance of plip 232 but simply that it means we shouldn't invest
too much into 'pimping' the registries themselves but rather put
future efforts into middle ware.
right?
cheers,
tom
\malthe
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
