Do you want to specify a number in advance? I think all we'd specified in the DC meeting was that it should be an odd number. Not picking a number in advance would allow some flexibility to adapt the the quality of the applications.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Tom Lazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks for the draft, steve! > > i wouldn't change anything, but unless my cold is still clogging up my > brain too much, it doesn't seem to state the number of members the team will > have, which might be worth mentioning to applicants. > > so perhaps we could stick that in there somewhere? > > cheers, > > tom > > > On Oct 28, 2008, at 5:10 PM, Steve McMahon wrote: > > DRAFT Call for Plone 4.x Framework Team Members >> >> Would you like to help choose what goes into Plone 4? >> >> The Plone Framework team is now receiving applications for membership in >> the Plone 4 Framework Team. >> >> The Framework Team will be responsible for evaluating the PLone >> Improvement Proposals (PLIPS) for Plone 4.x. The team also nominates the >> release manager to the Plone Foundation Board, which does the hiring. PLIP >> evaluation consists of considering the benefits and risks associated with a >> PLIP and casting a reasoned and explained +/- 1 vote on each proposal. >> Framework Team members also follow PLIP implementation, and make >> recommendations to the Release Manager. >> >> Qualifications include: >> • An awareness of community strategic discussions about Plone's >> development; >> • Ability to make a long-term committment. Plone 4 will take some >> time, and the team will stay together to work on the entire 4.x series. >> • A good understanding of Plone's architecture and UI: enough to >> weigh risks and benefits; >> • Time to keep up with discussions on the Framework Team mailing >> lists; >> • The ability to occasionally budget a significant amount of time >> for evaluating PLIPs in detail as feature-lock deadlines approach; >> • The ability to work with SVN well enough to test PLIP integration >> and implementation for final evaluation; >> • The personality to get along well in a flexible, give-and-take >> group process and to accept and support group decisions. >> New Framework Team members will be chosen by existing Framework Team >> members and involved FWT alumni. Considerations will include many criteria >> beyond the simply technical. The new team must be balanced in skills and >> likely to work well together. >> >> Please note something new: the Plone 3.x Framework Team will continue to >> work on enhancing Plone 3.x during the development of Plone 4 and possibly >> afterwards. >> >> If you're interested, please send an introductory note, explaining your >> interest and qualifications, to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Postings >> from non-subscribers are rejected, so if you're not a subscriber, send your >> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a request for forwarding. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Framework-Team mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team >> > > -- Steve McMahon Reid-McMahon, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Steve McMahon Reid-McMahon, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
