Martin Aspeli wrote: > Martin Aspeli wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg? >> >> Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight? > > Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3. > > This one should be compatible with 3.2. You can use it straight away by > adding Products.NuPlone to your eggs. > > The question now is how we deal with the release. We could: > > - Add Products.NuPlone as a dependency of the Plone egg. This would > mean 'Plone' always comes with NuPlone, but there's no reason overt for > the dependency.
+1. Plone 3 ships with NuPlone in the same way it does with CMFEditions or any other package, we shouldn't change this in the 3.x series. Please introduce no special handling of it. Hanno _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team