On 20 January 2011 19:07, Alec Mitchell <ale...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Ross Patterson <m...@rpatterson.net> wrote: >> Eric Steele <ems...@psu.edu> writes: >> >>> I'd like to get a final consensus on whether or not PLIP 9327 will be >>> included in 4.1. From discussion last week, several of you wanted to >>> hold out until we knew whether collections and search results would be >>> in. At this point, it looks like those two will be pushed off for 4.2. >>> >>> With 5 of 8 votes in, it stands at a +4 for inclusion. Are there any >>> objections to my considering it approved? >> >> I'm a strong +1 for someone releasing this package to pypi so we can use >> it out in the world, but I'm -1 on including it with core Plone without >> those PLIPs that depend on it being included. I've updated my vote on >> the spreadsheet and that bring the total to +2. > > I feel identically.
I've changed my vote on this. If we don't actually use the code there is no point in requiring it. Laurence _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
