Thanks for the info! This might be a dumb question, but I'm limited on my light metering options. I have a Krasnogorsk 3 and it has a built in light meter. I'm assuming it is an ambient meter, not a spot meter. (I shoud probably confirm that...) Do you expect this will give me good exposure?
I definetly want some depth of field to work with, but also don't want to be stopped all the way down to like 11 or 16 and have no soft areas in the shot. I think around a 4 or 5.6 is the goal. Thanks again! Nicole Elaine Baker Peterson (she/her/they) Founder & Head Programmer, Media Monsters [email protected] *twitch.tv/media_monsters <http://twitch.tv/media_monsters> | **magiklantern.com <http://www.magiklantern.com/>* On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:44 PM Scott Dorsey <[email protected]> wrote: > In general, those displays are pretty bright when viewed head-on. So your > worry is more likely to be overexposing than underexposing. > > I would go with a color negative stock because you have so much additional > freedom to overexpose. The negative stock is inherently compensating and > highlights won't block up as easily as reversal. > > And I would probably use something in the 100 to 200 ASA range. No need > for > super fast stock, but you might want a little more depth of field than you > get shooting wide open with 50D. > --scott > > > > -- > Frameworks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org >
-- Frameworks mailing list [email protected] https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
