Quoting: Fred Camper <f...@fredcamper.com>

>The article implies that the bankruptcy that Kodak is considering wold  
>allow it to continue to operate. I don't think liquidiation is in the  
>cards anytime soon.

I concure. I have heard through the rumormill that the Motion Picture division 
of Kodak has continued to remain profitable. Since all of the equipment used to 
manufacture the actual film is an "older" technology, it wouldn't make much 
sense to liquidate it. The value would be little more than the scrap value of 
its parts, so it would seem reasonable to keep it operational, and therefore 
profitable. I wouldn't expect too much more R&D, but as long as there is a 
Kodak company based in Rochester, I don't think we'll see the disappearance of 
film. However, it also seems likely that when the plug is pulled on film stock, 
and more importantly, the commercial manufacture of processing chemistry, it 
will be sudden.

Then again, there's some companies down the chain (post-houses that specialize 
in film scans, for one) that rely on film as a continued capture medium might 
step up at that point to purchase some of the manufacturing facilities and 
silver-halide related patents. If they could purchase things for 
pennies-on-the-dollar (as they might through a liquidation), they could then 
run these units at a very low profit, or even a slight loss, if only to keep 
the filmstock flowing as long as possible. I'm not holding my breathe on this 
scenario, but my fingers are crossed. As I write this I'm realizing just how 
difficult it would be to convince a lender to financially support a plan to 
vertically integrate a post-house into a declining industrial field.

-Jason Halprin

FrameWorks mailing list

Reply via email to