Hi Jonas, I'd like to make another post in the forum, if I may. I'm looking for any old 8mm or 16mm home movies, or undeveloped/expired 8mm/16mm film. If anyone has any available to send to me (I will happily pay any shipping costs), or knows someone who does, they can email me at [email protected]
Thanks so much for your time. Daniel On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:00 PM, <[email protected]>wrote: > Send FrameWorks mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of FrameWorks digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Elf 16mm projector (Gawthrop, Rob) > 2. Film leaders (Matt Soar) > 3. Re: Film leaders (graeme hogg) > 4. Re: Fotokem LA? (Christopher Harris) > 5. Re: Fotokem LA? (Christopher Harris) > 6. Re: Film leaders ([email protected]) > 7. film analysis (Gene Youngblood) > 8. film analysis again (Gene Youngblood) > 9. Re: film analysis ([email protected]) > 10. Re: film analysis again (John MacKay) > 11. Re: film analysis (Myron Ort) > 12. Re: film analysis (Myron Ort) > 13. Re: film analysis (Myron Ort) > 14. Re: film analysis (Tim Halloran) > 15. Re: film analysis again (Jonathan Walley) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Gawthrop, Rob" <[email protected]> > To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>, > Kevin Timmins <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 20:06:02 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Elf 16mm projector > Bought a set from them recently, I’m sure it’s what you want and they > despatch promptly. > > Rob > > > On 18/05/2012 13:52, "Kevin Timmins" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks! > > I'm located in the UK, ideally it would be great to find some from around > here. I found this: > > > http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ELF-16mm-Cine-Projector-4-Drive-Belt-Set-Motor-Rewind-Both-Spool-Arm-Belts-/150808145860?pt=UK_Photography_VintagePhotography_VintagePhotoAccessories&hash=item231cddafc4#ht_1802wt_1026 > > Are these all the belts I need? > Best > Kevin > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 05:33:45 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Elf 16mm projector > > > You're missing the round shutter pulley belt. The two grooves in the > pulley is to switch film speed or 50/60 Hz. > > >From the state of the main drive belt, I'd replace that as well. You mind > as well replace all belts with a whole new set, including the > feed and take-up. > > Where are you located? > > Richard Pattchetts has a large collection of new-old-stock Eiki belts. He > is located in Michigan USA. > http://www.16mmdirectory.org/search?q=patchetts > > > Alain > > > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Kevin Timmins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Frameworks, > > I purchased an Elf projector some time ago and I discovered that it was > missing some belts (two I think). Here is a link to some pictures: > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/73172807@N06/?uploaded=2&magic_cookie=4bf21de9f77e9f1a52dbdb154e759a2b< > http://www.flickr.com/photos/73172807%40N06/?uploaded=2&magic_cookie=4bf21de9f77e9f1a52dbdb154e759a2b> > > > Can anyone tell me what belts I need to find/ where to get them. > > All the best and thanks in advance! > Kevin > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > > > ------------------------------ > > This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the intended > recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please inform us > immediately and then delete it. Unless it specifically states otherwise > this email does not form part of a contract. > > > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent those of University College Falmouth. You should > carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. University > College Falmouth accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be > caused by software viruses > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Matt Soar <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 16:08:19 -0400 > Subject: [Frameworks] Film leaders > Hi folks, > > I have started using 'found' commercial film leaders in my work, and > am wondering if list members can point me to any existing films where > the maker has used a comparable approach. I'm also fascinated with the > purposes of these 'paratextual' markings (eg 'SMTP'; 'end of picture'; > 'finish'; but also handwritten film titles and markings, etc) and am > therefore very keen to find scholarly or technical writing about > commercial film leaders. I've trawled through a few library databases > without much luck. > > Thanks in advance for any tips. I'll compile any responses and post > them back to frameworks. > > All best wishes, > > > Matt Soar > > > > -- > Dr. Matt Soar > Associate Professor > Communication Studies > Concordia University > > > http://coms.concordia.ca/faculty/soar.html > http://www.korsakow.org > http://www.a-r-c.ca > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: graeme hogg <[email protected]> > To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 21:27:22 +0100 (BST) > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Film leaders > > > 'Your Film and The Lab' by L.Bernard Happe in the Focal Press 'Media > Manual' series has good stuff about this. > > > Hi folks, >> >> I have started using 'found' commercial film leaders in my work, and >> am wondering if list members can point me to any existing films where >> the maker has used a comparable approach. I'm also fascinated with the >> purposes of these 'paratextual' markings (eg 'SMTP'; 'end of picture'; >> 'finish'; but also handwritten film titles and markings, etc) and am >> therefore very keen to find scholarly or technical writing about >> commercial film leaders. I've trawled through a few library databases >> without much luck. >> >> Thanks in advance for any tips. I'll compile any responses and post >> them back to frameworks. >> >> All best wishes, >> >> >> Matt Soar >> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Matt Soar >> Associate Professor >> Communication Studies >> Concordia University >> >> >> http://coms.concordia.ca/**faculty/soar.html<http://coms.concordia.ca/faculty/soar.html> >> http://www.korsakow.org >> http://www.a-r-c.ca >> ______________________________**_________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.**webfaction.com/listinfo/**frameworks<https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks> >> > > -- > > http://www.bristol-channel.**org/skomer<http://www.bristol-channel.org/skomer> > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Christopher Harris <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 20:32:12 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Fotokem LA? > I'm looking for a 10-bit uncompressed 1920x1080 transfer. Thanks for > the other recommendations. > > CH > > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:01:05 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Fotokem LA? > > > How about Cinelab (New Bedford, MA) or Alpha Cine (Seattle). Both do fine > B/W processing and printing. > > As for your uncompressed Quicktime, are you talking Apple ProRes HQ > scanned 1920x1080 or 2K (pillarbox)? > > Alain > > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Christopher Harris < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I need some lab work done and I'm wondering if anyone has any feedback to > report about Fotokem in LA (or New York for that matter). > > I need 16mm b/w negative processing, work printing and uncompressed > quicktime transfer. > > Thanks for any and all feedback about Fotokem. > > CH > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > > > -- > 40 FRAMES > Alain LeTourneau > Pam Minty > > 40 FRAMES > 5232 North Williams Avenue > Portland, Oregon 97217 > USA > > +1 503 231 6548 > www.40frames.org > www.16mmdirectory.org > www.emptyquarterfilm.org > > > _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Christopher Harris <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 20:36:09 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Fotokem LA? > Thanks to everyone for all of the lab recommendations and feedback about > Fotokem. > > CH > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:56:31 +0000 > Subject: [Frameworks] Fotokem LA? > > Hello all, > > I need some lab work done and I'm wondering if anyone has any feedback to > report about Fotokem in LA (or New York for that matter). > > I need 16mm b/w negative processing, work printing and uncompressed > quicktime transfer. > > Thanks for any and all feedback about Fotokem. > > CH > > _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:11:32 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Film leaders > You should watch Guy Sherwin's film At the Academy. Wilhelm and Birgit > Hein also made a whole film like this, > > Nicky. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Soar <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Fri, 18 May 2012 16:08 > Subject: [Frameworks] Film leaders > > Hi folks, > > I have started using 'found' commercial film leaders in my work, and > am wondering if list members can point me to any existing films where > the maker has used a comparable approach. I'm also fascinated with the > purposes of these 'paratextual' markings (eg 'SMTP'; 'end of picture'; > 'finish'; but also handwritten film titles and markings, etc) and am > therefore very keen to find scholarly or technical writing about > commercial film leaders. I've trawled through a few library databases > without much luck. > > Thanks in advance for any tips. I'll compile any responses and post > them back to frameworks. > > All best wishes, > > > Matt Soar > > > > -- > Dr. Matt Soar > Associate Professor > Communication Studies > Concordia University > > http://coms.concordia.ca/faculty/soar.htmlhttp://www.korsakow.orghttp://www.a-r-c.ca > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing > [email protected]https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Gene Youngblood" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:38:13 -0600 > Subject: [Frameworks] film analysis > Friends, > What would you cite as the most detailed and comprehensive analysis ever > written about the form and content one filmmaker’s *total *body of work? > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Gene Youngblood" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:43:08 -0600 > Subject: [Frameworks] film analysis again > I’m sure you filled in the missing word, but it bugs me to leave it > uncorrected: > > Friends, > What would you cite as the most detailed and comprehensive analysis ever > written about the form and content of one filmmaker’s *total *body of > work? > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 21:46:25 -0400 (EDT) > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] film analysis > ** > In a message dated 5/18/2012 6:39:02 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > Friends, > What would you cite as the most detailed and comprehensive analysis ever > written about the form and content one filmmaker’s *total *body of work? > > > Truffaut's Hitchcock? > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: John MacKay <[email protected]> > To: Gene Youngblood <[email protected]>, Experimental Film Discussion > List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 21:50:51 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] film analysis again > > On May 18, 2012, at 9:43 PM, Gene Youngblood wrote: > > I’m sure you filled in the missing word, but it bugs me to leave it > uncorrected: > > Friends, > What would you cite as the most detailed and comprehensive analysis ever > written about the form and content of one filmmaker’s *total *body of > work? > > > Not sure: Charlie Musser's BEFORE THE NICKELODEON (on Porter)? Tom > Gunning's FILMS OF FRITZ LANG? Interesting question…. > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Myron Ort <[email protected]> > To: Gene Youngblood <[email protected]>, Experimental Film Discussion > List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:52:49 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] film analysis > Sitney's insights on /Brakhage > > Myron Ort > > > > On May 18, 2012, at 6:38 PM, Gene Youngblood wrote: > > Friends, >> What would you cite as the most detailed and comprehensive analysis ever >> written about the form and content one filmmaker’s total body of work? >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.**webfaction.com/listinfo/**frameworks<https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks> >> > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Myron Ort <[email protected]> > To: Gene Youngblood <[email protected]>, Experimental Film Discussion > List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:55:13 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] film analysis > For me it has been Sitney's insights on Brakhage, all along. > > Myron Ort > > > > On May 18, 2012, at 6:38 PM, Gene Youngblood wrote: > > Friends, >> What would you cite as the most detailed and comprehensive analysis >> ever written about the form and content one filmmaker’s total body >> of work? >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.**webfaction.com/listinfo/**frameworks<https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.**webfaction.com/listinfo/**frameworks<https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks> > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Myron Ort <[email protected]> > To: Gene Youngblood <[email protected]>, Experimental Film Discussion > List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:05:18 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] film analysis > For me it has been Sitney's insights on Brakhage, all along. > At least for his angle on the work, which is deep. > > Actually, as far as I am concerned, no one has really nailed it on anyone. > > Myron Ort > > > > On May 18, 2012, at 6:38 PM, Gene Youngblood wrote: > > Friends, >> What would you cite as the most detailed and comprehensive analysis >> ever written about the form and content one filmmaker’s total body >> of work? >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.**webfaction.com/listinfo/**frameworks<https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.**webfaction.com/listinfo/**frameworks<https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks> > > ______________________________**_________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.**webfaction.com/listinfo/**frameworks<https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks> > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Tim Halloran <[email protected]> > To: Gene Youngblood <[email protected]>, Experimental Film Discussion > List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:22:05 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] film analysis > Naremore on Welles? > > Tim > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 18, 2012, at 6:39 PM, "Gene Youngblood" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Friends, > What would you cite as the most detailed and comprehensive analysis ever > written about the form and content one filmmaker’s *total *body of work? > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jonathan Walley <[email protected]> > To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:02:50 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] film analysis again > David Bordwell's book on Ozu is a towering achievement. And it's available > for free pdf download here: > > https://www.cjspubs.lsa.umich.edu/electronic/facultyseries/list/series/ozu.php > > In a very different way, Bazin's book on Renoir. "The French Renoir" > (Chapter 5) is perhaps the best, most complete, and most sophisticated > statement of Bazin's aesthetic. Some of its passages are pure poetry, too. > > Not so many books on avant-garde/experimental filmmakers come to mind. > Lots of essay collections dedicated to a single filmmaker (e.g. the recent > book on Ken Jacobs), but fewer sustained, book-length efforts. Several on > Warhol, of course, but it's practically impossible to cover his total body > of film work. JJ Murphy's recent THE BLACK HOLE OF THE CAMERA comes > closest, and I highly recommend it. > > Jonathan > > Jonathan Walley > Associate Professor of Cinema > Denison University > > > On May 18, 2012, at 9:50 PM, John MacKay wrote: > > > On May 18, 2012, at 9:43 PM, Gene Youngblood wrote: > > I’m sure you filled in the missing word, but it bugs me to leave it > uncorrected: > > Friends, > What would you cite as the most detailed and comprehensive analysis ever > written about the form and content of one filmmaker’s *total *body of > work? > > > Not sure: Charlie Musser's BEFORE THE NICKELODEON (on Porter)? Tom > Gunning's FILMS OF FRITZ LANG? Interesting question…. > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
