Of course a lot of us used Steenbecks to edit films… and still do. They were quite expensive so would not be commonly used by researchers not attached to institutions (or with large grants).
> On Sep 5, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Watter, Seth <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm wondering if people know of any texts that deal with the history of the > flatbed editor--more in its capacity as a viewing/analysis machine than as an > actual editing setup. I've found a few old articles on the Moviola in > journals like American Cinematographer, but they're strictly trade press > stuff, often just to advertise new product. I'm interested in how these > devices like Moviola and Steenbeck helped foster new forms of film analysis > (especially in the social sciences), and when they became > affordable/available beyond big studio production. Any suggestions would be > immensely helpful. > > Thanks, > > Seth Watter > PhD candidate, Modern Culture & Media > Brown University > Co-Director, Magic Lantern Cinema > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks Jeff Kreines Kinetta [email protected] kinetta.com _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
