Always wondered what kind of machine is that S.E. is using in this photo....
2015-09-05 20:21 GMT-04:00 Jeff Kreines <[email protected]>: > Of course a lot of us used Steenbecks to edit films… and still do. > > They were quite expensive so would not be commonly used by researchers not > attached to institutions (or with large grants). > > > On Sep 5, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Watter, Seth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm wondering if people know of any texts that deal with the history of > the flatbed editor--more in its capacity as a viewing/analysis machine than > as an actual editing setup. I've found a few old articles on the Moviola in > journals like American Cinematographer, but they're strictly trade press > stuff, often just to advertise new product. I'm interested in how these > devices like Moviola and Steenbeck helped foster new forms of film analysis > (especially in the social sciences), and when they became > affordable/available beyond big studio production. Any suggestions would be > immensely helpful. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Seth Watter > > PhD candidate, Modern Culture & Media > > Brown University > > Co-Director, Magic Lantern Cinema > > _______________________________________________ > > FrameWorks mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > Jeff Kreines > Kinetta > [email protected] > kinetta.com > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
