Also keep in mind the Agfa/Wittner 200D is a polyester base. Some people don't like risking it in their camera in the event of a jam causing damage as well as the base being slightly thinner could affect critical focus. I shot it in an Auricon CineVoice with a 25mm Lytar and had no issues.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Sean Weitzel <[email protected]> wrote: > I shot a roll of the agfa/wittner and had it processed at Dwayne's Photo. > I was really unhappy with the green cast. I'm planning to try some old > Ektachrome VNF thats been frozen since new. Anyone have experience with > 7250 or 2283 and processing it as E6? > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Amanda Thomson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> >> I've also shot 3383 in camera. The main thing to keep in mind (aside >> from it needing lots of light) is that it's expecting the orange mask of >> colour negative so it makes everything super blue if processed in E6 (1st >> dev 1min, 2nd dev 2 mins, blix 2 mins, stab 30 sec). You can put orange >> filters in your camera to compensate. Alternately if processed to negative >> its orange. >> >> I've also used the Agfa/Wittner/Aviphot stock it's quite grainy, which >> seems especially noticable when transfered digitally. It has an orange >> brownish leaning. I'm curious to shoot some green now though. >> >> Amanda >> >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:00 AM, <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Send FrameWorks mailing list submissions to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> [email protected] >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of FrameWorks digest..." >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa (Dan Anderson) >>> 2. Re: 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa (Pip Chodorov) >>> 3. Re: 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa (Scott Dorsey) >>> 4. Elmo Xenon CX-350 (Michael Walsh) >>> 5. Re: Elmo Xenon CX-350 (Francisco Torres) >>> 6. Re: 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa (Ryder White) >>> 7. Re: Elmo Xenon CX-350 (Michael Walsh) >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Dan Anderson <[email protected]> >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:48:37 -0600 >>> Subject: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa >>> Hey all, >>> >>> Wondering if there are any E6 color reversal enthusiasts here that have >>> used Wittner Chrome 200D and/or Agfa Aviphot 200D ?? >>> >>> Looked for tests on YouTube, and the Wittner looks better, although >>> it's hard to judge due to different types of footage and transfer >>> qualities.. I'm interested in using it for optical printing and maybe >>> in-camera... Hand-developing if I get ambitious. >>> >>> And for extra credit.. Anyone ever try using Kodak 3383 print stock in a >>> camera? >>> >>> Thanks!! >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Pip Chodorov <[email protected]> >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:54:02 +0100 >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa >>> Hey Dan, >>> Wittner repackaged Agfa's stock, so it's exactly the same stuff. >>> This was originally designed for arial photography, perhaps for >>> mapmaking or topography. >>> Therefore it has a certain look and is especially receptive to green. >>> I doubt it will look good in the optical printer (you will need a CTB >>> filter because it's balanced for daylight). Hand developing is easy in E6. >>> -Pip >>> >>> >>> >>> At 11:48 -0600 23/01/17, Dan Anderson wrote: >>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> Wondering if there are any E6 color reversal enthusiasts here that have >>>> used Wittner Chrome 200D and/or Agfa Aviphot 200D ?? >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Scott Dorsey <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: >>> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:00:46 -0500 >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa >>> I think the Wittner and Agfa films are the same film off of one big jumbo >>> that was released a couple years back. When it is gone it is likely >>> gone. >>> >>> 3383 is very slow but if you can stand one or two seconds per frame it >>> could be interesting. >>> --scott >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Michael Walsh <[email protected]> >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 09:14:37 -0900 >>> Subject: [Frameworks] Elmo Xenon CX-350 >>> Hello All, >>> I have a 16mm Elmo Xenon CX-350 projector. The amplifier is not working >>> and I'm wondering where to send out for repair. >>> Any leads appreciated! >>> -Michael Walsh >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Francisco Torres <[email protected]> >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:18:45 -0400 >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Elmo Xenon CX-350 >>> where are you located? >>> >>> 2017-01-23 14:14 GMT-04:00 Michael Walsh <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> I have a 16mm Elmo Xenon CX-350 projector. The amplifier is not working >>>> and I'm wondering where to send out for repair. >>>> Any leads appreciated! >>>> -Michael Walsh >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Ryder White <[email protected]> >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:21:08 -0800 >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa >>> Hey Dan, >>> >>> I've shot and processed a few rolls of the Agfa aviphot and like Pip >>> says hand processing in E6 is very doable. I found it to be a pretty >>> tolerant stock for that, but then again my QC is not very exacting so take >>> that with a grain of salt. >>> >>> I know of a few people who have used 3383 as a camera stock, myself >>> included, and it is worth experimenting with since it's so (comparatively) >>> cheap. Rate it around 6 asa and treat it more like a tungsten stock. If you >>> get outside in the bright sun with a fast lens you might be able to shoot >>> it at something close to 24fps. It's also possible to cross process it to a >>> positive in E6. Getting a standard, well-balanced image is not something >>> I've been able to do with 3383 (could also be my processing, as mentioned >>> before) but it's very well-suited to abstraction... >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> R >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Scott Dorsey <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think the Wittner and Agfa films are the same film off of one big >>>> jumbo >>>> that was released a couple years back. When it is gone it is likely >>>> gone. >>>> >>>> 3383 is very slow but if you can stand one or two seconds per frame it >>>> could be interesting. >>>> --scott >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Michael Walsh <[email protected]> >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:25:14 -0900 >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Elmo Xenon CX-350 >>> The projector and I are located in Anchorage Alaska >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco Torres <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> where are you located? >>>> >>>> 2017-01-23 14:14 GMT-04:00 Michael Walsh <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Hello All, >>>>> I have a 16mm Elmo Xenon CX-350 projector. The amplifier is not >>>>> working and I'm wondering where to send out for repair. >>>>> Any leads appreciated! >>>>> -Michael Walsh >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FrameWorks mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> https://vimeo.com/amandat >> http://www.irisfilmcollective.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >> >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
