It seems to be targeted at digital videomakers (including the Hollywood 
directors that Dave Tetzlaff named) who want that "super 8 look" including 
conspicuous crud in the gate.
John Porter, Toronto, Canada

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 7/13/17, Dave Tetzlaff <djte...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Kodak Super8 digital camera
 To: "Experimental Film Discussion List" <frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com>
 Received: Thursday, July 13, 2017, 9:05 PM
 
 > Mindless design. No optical
 viewfinder, just a flip out video screen. Plus, it is
 overpriced. 
 
 The projected
 price of the initial "limited edition” version is
 $2000, with a less expensive “standard edition”
 supposedly to follow. It’s a film camera, so the real cost
 is in the stock and processing:
 
 > Filmmakers using the new Kodak camera can
 send the 50’ cartridge to Kodak for developing and for a
 $100 developing fee Kodak will mail back to the filmmaker
 the developed film on a reel as well post a scanned digital
 version of the 2.5 minute film in a password protected cloud
 file.
 
 I’d have to guess
 the concept and pricing reflect a similar approach to The
 Impossible Project’s new design Polaroid film camera, also
 very expensive. These things seem targeted at cost-no-object
 users in Hollywood and hipsterdom, who get off on having
 whatever tool – vintage or new-fangled – has been used
 by some cel;ebrity maker in some high-profile project. 
 
 > Before the reborn Super 8
 camera has even hit store, big Hollywood names such as
 directors Steve Spielberg, Christopher Nolam, and J.J.
 Abrams have endorsed the product.
 
 For reference, Pro8mm in Burbank sells rebuilt
 Beaulieu 4008’s for $2000.
 
 I’d expect folks who want to do experimental
 work in S8 to stick to old Canons and Nizos or whatever
 shows up in decent condition at the local thrift store or on
 eBay. 
 
 Jeff: what’s the
 problem with having what amounts to video assist versus a
 dim optical finder? Isn’t the good news here for
 photochemical filmies that some sort of stock and processing
 options will remain available from Kodak a while longer now
 that they have this thing to support?
 
 There’s a 46 second test clip from a Kodak
 prototype on YT [http://tinyurl.com/yayv8yok] complete
 with plastic pressure-plate registration flutter, dust and
 scratch in the negative glitches, and a nice chunk of crud
 in the gate. Ahh, the memories...
 _______________________________________________
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
 
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to