On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:26:54PM +1000, Chris Samuel wrote: > On 20/07/12 13:14, Ben Sturmfels wrote: > > > At last night's discussion group, I mentioned that I'd like to see us > > support the FSF's statement on Restricted Boot vs Secure Boot: > > > > http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement > > That petition code is broken at the moment.. :-( Yep. It's sadly been broken for some time now (I've tried on at least two separate occasions).
> # Sorry. A non-recoverable error has occurred. > # The requested Profile (gid=37) is disabled OR it is not configured > # to be used for 'Profile' listings in its Settings OR there is no > # Profile with that ID OR you do not have permission to access this > # profile. Please contact the site administrator if you need assistance. > > Will report to their webmaster. I would be surprised if the FSF wasn't aware, given the popularity of the petition. Can't hurt to ask though.
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Free-software-melb mailing list Freeemail@example.com http://lists.softwarefreedom.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/free-software-melb