On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:26:54PM +1000, Chris Samuel wrote:
> On 20/07/12 13:14, Ben Sturmfels wrote:
> > At last night's discussion group, I mentioned that I'd like to see us
> > support the FSF's statement on Restricted Boot vs Secure Boot:
> > 
> > http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
> That petition code is broken at the moment.. :-(
Yep. It's sadly been broken for some time now (I've tried on at least two
separate occasions).

> # Sorry. A non-recoverable error has occurred.
> # The requested Profile (gid=37) is disabled OR it is not configured
> # to be used for 'Profile' listings in its Settings OR there is no
> # Profile with that ID OR you do not have permission to access this
> # profile. Please contact the site administrator if you need assistance.
> Will report to their webmaster.

I would be surprised if the FSF wasn't aware, given the popularity of the
petition. Can't hurt to ask though.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Free-software-melb mailing list

Reply via email to