Although I agree that being rejected service due to VPN usage is both
sad and problematic, they are probably correct that more fraud happens
via VPNs. It is the same with TOR. Although there are a multitude of
reasons for regular citizens to use TOR or VPNs to protect their
privacy, it is also true that these technologies make it safer for
people to conduct criminal activity.
To me, the situation we are in as users-of-VPNs-for-privacy-reasons is
similar to that of an insurance company telling me that when I was a
25yo male, my car insurance was much more expensive. I could talk to
them as much as I want about my personal driving record, or about other
aspects of my demographic which would indicate I may be a safe driver.
In the end, I believe them when they have the aggregate statistics to
say that _on average_ 25yo males are worse than most other drivers.
Unfortunately I don't think that the banking institution is doing
anything unreasonable _from the perspective of a business trying to
maximize profit_, even though it is unreasonable from a privacy/ethical
I hope that as more people move onto VPNs and TOR, that the loss of
business from excluding those users outnumbers the loss in money from
fraudulent transactions. Then it becomes good business to allow VPN and
TOR users to access financial services.
On 2017-04-21 10:29, Ben Finney wrote:
Brian May <br...@linuxpenguins.xyz>
Part of the problem here is how poor the security is on Internet
credit card transactions. All you have to do is place a transaction,
and after the goods have been shipped dispute it with the credit card
company (I lost my card!). Then the retailer has to try and prove that
the transaction was genuine (they can't).
Agreed. What concerns me is the *additional* implied claim: that
connections over a VPN will be so much more difficult to authenticate,
that the “financial partner” must exclude them.
I am not sure if there is any truth in the claim that VPNs attract
fraudulent credit card. Just as easy to get away with credit card
fraud without a VPN I think.
I agree, and that was the position I pressed: that this was needlessly
discriminatory to people using a VPN connection, and that the
justification of “maybe fraud” does not justify that specific
I'm open to evidence that does support that claim. My knowledge, of how
credit cards fraud varies in different scenarios, is quite lacking.
Free-software-melb mailing list
Free Software Melbourne home page: http://www.freesoftware.asn.au/melb/