Re: NAME_MAX in win32impl.cpp (branch-1-5)?

[Gabor Fleischer]

On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Tom Spindler wrote:
> Should NAME_MAX (around line 160 in base/unix/src/win32impl.cpp in
                                                    ^^^^^
> the release-1-5 branch) be PATH_MAX? NAME_MAX isn't defined on
> Solaris (and I think it only refers to the old, old sysV max
  ^^^^^^^
Do you think they'll use this file on Solaris?

Flocsy

Gabor Fleischer
MAILTO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]       URL: http://www.mtesz.hu/~flocsy
SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]       ICQ UIN: 27733935