On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:53:22AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, August 30, 2013 10:51:02 am Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:39:59AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > On 29 August 2013 20:14, Sergey A. Osokin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:03:10PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > > > > Laura, > > > > > > > > > > Now bad news :) Last major Xorg update in ports, which happened > > > > > couple > > > > > of months ago, introduced a regression: xorg performs very slowly > > > > > after > > > > > resume. If the server process is restarted, then a new one performs > > > > > okay. > > > > > > > > Agree with Gleb. Kind of a slowness exist after resume. > > > > > > > Can y'all grab some basic, naive benchmarks (disk, CPU) and compare them > > > before/after a suspend/resume cycle? > > > > Unfortunately, I'm not sure what I need to check... > > Maybe try x11perf before and after? I just removed VESA from my kernel on an > X220 and it now suspends and resumes great in X. I don't notice any slowdown, > but I'm using a very simple tiling window manager (i3wm).
I'm also using i3 now, previously it was fvwm2 earlier with slowdown. Hmm... Gleb and Luara, could you try x11-wm/i3 for suspend/resume trick and check slowdown? -- Sergey A. Osokin [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
