Hm, +jkim. Any ideas?
On 7 January 2015 at 10:23, Juris Kaminskis <[email protected]> wrote: > 2015-01-05 17:27 GMT+02:00 Juris Kaminskis <[email protected]>: > >> >> 2015-01-04 15:17 GMT+02:00 Ian Smith <[email protected]>: >> > >> > On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000, [email protected] wrote: >> > >> > Please excuse this off-'zilla merely speculative response. No time, but >> > I've spent (wasted?) some time chasing a couple of these outside the PR. >> > >> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 >> > > >> > > --- Comment #14 from juris <[email protected]> --- >> > > Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. >> > >> > If true (in all cases) this is great news for those with a variety of HP >> > laptops that have been experiencing partial - or in some cases complete >> > after boot - failures in CMBAT monitoring since 9.0. And a Macbook Pro. >> > >> > So, reverting rev 216942 fixes it for you? On what FreeBSD version? >> >> I have compiled head branch revision 216941 and battery status via >> acpiconf works. When compiling from source revision 216942 acpiconf stops >> responding. I also tried to remove r216942 and compiled from source release >> 9.3, but there battery status was not working. Apparently there are more >> things than just one that breaks HP ACPI . >> > > Sorry for my previous email that was confusing. I did not revert r216941 > when compiled release 9.3. So when I did that, battery status works. I also > compiled release 10.1 with excluding r216942, and battery status works. So > this single change for some reason creates problem for HP laptops. > >> > >> > >> > If so, with scant comprehension of the code, questions that occur: >> > >> > a) did that revision fix some existing problem, the reverting of which >> > might reestablish problem/s in other machines? jkim? >> > >> > b) what is it in various HP ACPI implementations that don't seem to be a >> > reported problem on other hardware, particularly concerning EC handling? >> > >> > c) if this was wrong (for HPs), what would be right? (the hard one :) >> > >> > cheers, Ian >> >> On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Please excuse this off-'zilla merely speculative response. No time, but >> I've spent (wasted?) some time chasing a couple of these outside the PR. >> >> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 >> > >> > --- Comment #14 from juris <[email protected]> --- >> > Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. >> >> If true (in all cases) this is great news for those with a variety of HP >> laptops that have been experiencing partial - or in some cases complete >> after boot - failures in CMBAT monitoring since 9.0. And a Macbook Pro. >> >> So, reverting rev 216942 fixes it for you? On what FreeBSD version? >> >> If so, with scant comprehension of the code, questions that occur: >> >> a) did that revision fix some existing problem, the reverting of which >> might reestablish problem/s in other machines? jkim? >> >> b) what is it in various HP ACPI implementations that don't seem to be a >> reported problem on other hardware, particularly concerning EC handling? >> >> c) if this was wrong (for HPs), what would be right? (the hard one :) >> >> cheers, Ian >> > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
