On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:40 AM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Friday, January 30, 2015 12:37:10 pm Kevin Oberman wrote: > > My experience is the opposite. With KMS I could run with VESA and > without > > it I needed to pull VESA from my kernel. > > > > As of today I am running fine with KMS, i915, and vt(4) with a standard > > GENERIC 10-STABLE kernel. I was running KMS and vt(4) well before they > were > > MFCed, so I don't remember when I stopped adding "nooptions VESA", but I > > definitely used to need it to make suspect/resume work and don't any > longer. > > > > In any case, trying kernel without VESA is a good idea. > > FYI, VESA only applies to sc(4). It is ignored for vt(4). That is why it > "works" with vt(4). > > -- > John Baldwin > I suspected that was the case, but did not recall for sure. Thanks for the confirmation, though it does not help with the problem reported. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
