On 2018-03-05 15:51, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 02:48:26PM -0500, Stephen Cook wrote: >> The problem with the Foundation sponsoring a CoC is that a small group >> of extremists forced their way in to generate and implement their own >> set of rules, secretly. > > This is exactly not what happened.
Points of view will differ. Last I heard, there was a debate over whether it was appropriate or not to even have a CoC. Now it already exists, and is very obviously written by SJWs. >> I suspect from the lack of response to my earlier question that I >> accidentally paid for this when I thought I was donating to help develop >> an OS. > > An alternate explanation is that people are tired of going through every > sentence of every post about this, word by word, and trying to respond > in a way that cannot possibly be misconstrued. I haven't seen many posts about this, maybe you mean in the secret mailing list? It is a simple yes or no question, did money donated to the foundation pay these people to write this trash? I am not the first nor only one to ask. There is nothing to misconstrue or dance around. I cannot find this information on the site. > tl:dr; your conclusion is wrong. Some transparency would help people better understand what is going on. > I myself have neither the time nor motivation to respond to every single > message on this subject; it's demotivating. I suspect most of the posters > have already made up their minds, in any case. But you had time and motivation to respond to mine... To say I am wrong and that I do not deserve a response to my question, because everyone is tired of defending themselves after dumping on the community for the benefit of some activists. -- Stephen _______________________________________________ freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
