https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232021
--- Comment #6 from Oleg <supportsob...@mail.ru> --- If I give such permissions then I know what I'm doing and what can be sequence from my configuration. It's not the same as giving full root. I can limit access for this unprivileged user as I wish using other facilities of the OS, but I don't want limit root, neither I want use root for remote replication and backup scenarios. How mount is worst than say destroy or rollback in terms of system's vulnerability and stability? If I want give zfs destroy permissions to unprivileged user then it works, but if I want give him mount then it won't. I don't see any logic here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
