Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables

[Marcel Moolenaar]

Matthew Dillon wrote:

> :Well, it's also a module, so perhaps we should create the whole subtree
> :for modules (as was already discussed several times..)
> 
>     Yes, this is very true.  But I think we are fooling ourselves if we
>     believe linux emulation will not become 'standard' in the near future.
>     Then we'll kick ourselves for giving the sysctl's convoluted names :-)

I don't think we'll do ourselves a favor if we allow the Linuxulator to be
compiled into the kernel again. To much depends on it to be a module. I
write down "modules.linux" as an option (and a good one too, IMHO).

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar                                  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCC Internetworking & Databases                     http://www.scc.nl/
Amsterdam, The Netherlands                         tel: +31 20 4200655


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message