In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: > > It's a bug, one that I've brought up with Kirk. The problem is that the > structures used internally by softupdates are not condusive to doing a > hard-sync. I gues sync needs to set a flag which makes the sync'er go through all buckets with no delay and then wake the sync'ing process afterwards... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Sync(8) doesn't have any effect on softupdates-enabled f... Maxim Sobolev
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any effect on softupdates-... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any effect on softupda... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any effect on soft... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any effect on ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any effec... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any e... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any effec... Julian Elischer
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any effect on softupdates-... Julian Elischer
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any effect on softupdates-... Bruce Evans
- Re: Sync(8) doesn't have any effect on softupda... Matthew Dillon