On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Harold Gutch wrote: > Uhm, that's the way I see it being _right now_ as well. What I > was thinking of, was that things would go smoother if you > wouldn't upgrade _right now_, but in [insert some time in the > near future here], as things would perhaps be "fixed" by then. There is no fix to make. If the binaries built by the current sources cannot run unless the sigset_t stuff is in the kernel of the machine that they are running on this problem will never be "fixed." Doug -- "Stop it, I'm gettin' misty." - Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed John Polstra
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Marcel Moolenaar
- No Subject alanr
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Harold Gutch
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Harold Gutch
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Ben Rosengart
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes comm... Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Harold Gutch
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Garrett Wollman
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... John-Mark Gurney
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Jeremy Lea
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... John-Mark Gurney
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... John-Mark Gurney
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Jim Bloom
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Garrett Wollman